go to home page | go to navigation | go to page content | go to contact | go to sitemap
Home > Cases > eGovMoNet [eGovernment Monitor Network] > Fed-eView/Citizen - Listening to the citizens
practice Fed-eView/Citizen - Listening to the citizens

Fed-eView/Citizen - Listening to the citizens

1925 Visits
| Comments |
starstarstarempty starempty starIn order to vote, you need to be logged in!

Acronym of the case:

Fed-eViewC

Country of the case:

Belgium

Posting Date:

5 June 2007

Last Edited Date:

02 January 2008

Author:

Christine Mahieu (FEDICT - Ministry of ICT and e-government)
Fed-eView/Citizen - Listening to the citizens LogoMahieu's picture
Editor's Choice 2007

Type of initiative

  • Strategic initiative-imgStrategic initiative

Case Abstract

After measuring the degree of computerisation in the federal administrations, the Belgian Ministry of ICT decided in 2005 to create the Fed-eView/Citizen panel to measure the citizens’ (internet and non internet users) eGov needs and uses. The domains studied were eInclusion, eGovernment, e-society and e-democracy. Panels from both populations were followed in several waves over 15 months, and focus groups provided a list of potential applications to be developed. The federal Ministry of ICT is now developing a general measurement framework (an eGov monitor) which will allow to follow the evolution of several indicators in the long term.

Description of the case

Date
January 2005 to January 2007
Date operational
September 2005
Target Users
Citizen | Administrative
Target Users Description
The tool is first aimed and used for the strategic cell of the federal Ministry of ICT and eGovernment and its administration (Fedict). The tool is also useful for the other agencies developing an eGov policy in Belgium: the sector based institutions (like the Crossroads bank for Social Security), the eGov coordination units of each of the 3 regions and the 3 associations of municipalities. On a more specific level, the detailed results are available to all administrations and agencies in order to manage their own eGov or ICT initiatives.
Scope
National
Status
Operation
Language(s)
German | English | French | Dutch

Policy Context and Legal Framework

The Fed-eView instrument was launched by the Federal Minister in order to monitor the eGov strategy. Its first initiative, the Fed-e-View/Administration, focused on the measurement of the degree of computerisation in the back-offices of the administration. One year later, in 2005, it began to focus on user-centricity and Fed-e-View/Citizen was launched.

The “Fed-e-View” initiatives were initially aimed for federal purposes only. The Fed-eView/Citizen part is still being developed only by the federal level of authority but, of course, the citizen’s needs and views are not limited to the federal government, but to all the government levels.

As part of the cooperation agreement on Belgian eGov, the methodology and results of this tool are shared with the eGov coordination unit of each region. The objective is to generalise this tool.

This measurement effort is part of a bigger picture: based on these two experiences, we are now developing a general measurement framework (an eGov monitor) that will allow us to follow several indicators. Those indicators will be published in a dashboard, fed by local, regional and federal KPIs.To achieve those results the dashboard will be built on common agreed measurement themes. Indicators by theme will be defined taking into account the maturity of the topic (ex: eDemocracy is not mature in Belgium), using the results of the Fed-eView campaigns.

The measurement initiatives fit in the objective of the I2010 eGovernment action plan: measuring the progress for an efficient and effective administration. It is in line with the existing EU-benchmarking and eGovernment measurement efforts and the need expressed by the Commission to go for more user-centricity measurements.

Project Size and Implementation

Type of initiative
Participation
Overall Implementation approach
Public administration
Technology choice
Standards-based technology
Funding source
Public funding national
Project size
Implementation: €49-299,000
Yearly cost:
€1-49,000

Implementation and Management Approach

We partner with other federal administrations (statistics directorate, social inclusion and eInclusion department) through joint meetings and with the other eGov strategic cells at regional level through a strategic committee of cooperation.

Technology solution

The tool is available via email and Internet. The detailed results are available via the internal community for the administrations.

Impact, innovation and results

Impact

- The eInclusion perspective:
The tool confirms that ICT possession also effectively leads to ICT use. The measure makes also clear that the digital gap remains strongly present and gives relevant information to understand the socioeconomics of the “non adopters”. It also confirms that the target objective of the national action plan for eInclusion (reducing from 1/3 the digital gap within 2010) is realistic.

- The eGovernment perspective:
The results confirm the ignorance of the citizens about eGov initiatives and the need for more awareness campaigns (e.g. on the use of eID and electronic signature).They also provide new ideas for the future. It shows that the qualitative approach can bring useful results and that citizens are very likely to express their needs and define added value services for them.

- The e-security perspective:
The tool confirms the usefulness of several projects (computer security campaign, safe chat initiative) undertaken by the Ministry of ICT. It provides input for developing and building the citizen’s trust in the electronic administration.

- The e-democracy perspective:
It shows that it is an interesting area for the citizen.

Different sources are available to monitor ICT usage indicators but few are eGov related and are often looking at it from very specific perspectives (depending on the study’s sponsor). In this case, the study was conducted to assess the citizen’s needs and perceptions of electronic government, covering also related topics like ICT usage and security requirements.

It is also a very low-cost way of citizen’s feedback. The internet users are requested to participate by e-mail in a managed environment, meaning that the panel is a relative small but representative group of citizens from all levels of society (note that internet non users were contacted by telephone).

The concept of a citizen’s panel is not only scientifically representative, but it also gives the opportunity to go in-depth in the subject. The online surveys, as well as their longitudinally concept, give the opportunity to go quite profound in questioning behaviour and habits.

The next step following Fed-eView/C is ongoing: a measurement framework is under development for monitoring (via a dashboard application) eGovernment, eInclusion, e-society and eventually e-democracy aspects. This monitoring concept re-uses existing measurement frameworks at a maximum level: it will be composed by existing indicators (like Eurostat figures and other national statistics) and by new ones. At the end, the dashboard will be fed by more than 100 indicators, what makes possible to monitor the effect on users of governmental initiatives. The tool is in permanent evolution; it is not a one-off phenomenon.

Track record of sharing

At national level, the tool is influencing the national statistics survey on ICT households: the indicators related to the use and adoption of ICT have been integrated in this annual survey. The tool has also influenced the development of the eInclusion barometer. The methodology can be also be used by other countries and in European benchmarkings.

Lessons learnt

Lesson 1 - Using panels has limits: in 15 months time the panel is not representative anymore. It cannot be used for “open questions” or long questionnaires. Quantitative research followed by a qualitative approach, like “focus groups”, delivers a better view on citizen’s requirements and offer a better case for policy making

Lesson 2 - Since we always ask the same persons, we can only ask one time “have you ever heard about eID?”, so it is impossible to measure directly the impact of communication campaigns.

Lesson 3 - eGov is a horizontal matter, an enabler. It is difficult to define the scope (especially in focus groups): people will talk about their experience and satisfaction of public services in general and not on the use and needs of eGov services. It is also difficult to rate the use of these services, since a citizen will only ask for a birth declaration or a building permit if needed. There is no sense to inquire about some services.

Multimedia Content Select a Tab

There isn't any image for this case
There isn't any Video for this case
In order to send a message you need to be registered at least one month and have earned more than 150 kudos.
go to the SEMIC web page
eGovernment