Impact
As was noted in the EU funded report Flossimpact investigating the economic impact of open source software in Europe:
“PloneGov impact is unusual in terms of opportunity for innovation, standardization and economy of scale while gaining independence from large IT providers”. www.flossimpact.eu
History and impact
In 2007, CommunesPlone.org (Belgium, France) was strongly connected with two other Plone based eGovernment projects: UdalPlone (Basque country Spain-France) and PloneGov.ch (Switzerland). Due to their complementarities, the 3 projects merged on June1, 2007 creating an open international project named PloneGov. The goal was to share efforts and existing applications between all participants and to reach more organizations.
In its early stage PloneGov included 16 towns from Belgium, 3 from France, 13 from Spain, 2 from Switzerland and 2 towns acting as observers from Argentina and Uruguay.
In the period 2007-2009 many more organizations joined the project, which presently reaches 100s Public Organizations in more than 20 countries.
PloneGov highlights the amazing potential of growth of its SubCommunities, which are Collaboratives groupings. For example: from 2 Belgian towns early 2005, the CommunesPlone project reaches now 100 towns and cities in Belgium-France, and 2 regional governments. In Wallonia (Belgium), the project reaches already 30% of the local governments. While UdalPlone reaches 30 local governments, PlinKit, a US collaborative focusing on public libraries reaches already 225 organizations and is planning to disseminate its project to 1000 public organizations by 2010.
A census made in May 2009 indicates that PloneGov, its members and SubCommunities, and a number of public organizations supporting the project are reaching 727 public organizations using at least one application. According to the same organizations, the number of public organizations reached should have more than doubled by the end of 2010.
Economy of scale
So far, the public organizations involved have financed the project, with little political or financial support. It confirms the potential of economy of scale allowed by pooling human resources and software developments.
For example, comparing market prices, the initial cost for a generic CommunesPlone web portal has been divided by 10 per local government. The price went down from 10 000 euro to 1 000 euro. While reducing the expenses for large towns, PloneGov also enable small towns to get a state of the art infrastructure compared to earlier unaffordable solutions.
This economy of scale not only contributes to attract new participants, but also enable them to invest their saving into the project and/or benefit from more applications for a given annual budget.
On the other hand, PloneGov international coordination still relies mostly on voluntary contributions from entrepreneurs from the public sector, non-profit associations as Zea Partners and individuals. This active group has invested in PloneGov an immeasurable amount of (unpaid) overtime.
Entrepreneurship and training
The lack of budget and political support has been balanced by entrepreneurship, openness to newcomers and collaboration. These conditions have stimulated an environment in favour of innovation and attractive to high potentials developers from the public sector and SME.
The Community behind PloneGov is strongly motivated and committed to develop the project. The enthusiasm of its members is a factor of promotion as well as the growing pool of application and services proposed to newcomers. The working methodology based on an open source community practices enables developers from the public sector (towns and regions) to work together, and to create generic tools adapted to their organization. The collaboration with SME experts in open source adds an additional value to the project in term of skills transfer. This methodology also benefits public employees who become more efficient within their own administrations.
As they invest in eGovernment and in collaborative portals, local entities enable their citizens and employees to get familiar with knowledge society as planned by Lisbon objectives. Indeed, while adding to the Internet site of the collectively, citizens, associations, SME and merchants get familiar with using new technologies.
For example, the town of Seneffe (Belgium) provides to all its local associations and SME a page on its portal and training to enable citizen to update it. On its side, the town of Sambreville (Belgium), reusing the default portal and the “town meeting management” tool, has provided an intranet to the local RedCross and a non-profit association.
Technical Innovation
At the heart of PloneGov is the development of software for supporting eGovernment within local government associations. The PloneGov approach to collaboration encourages the local associations to influence the software development directly, helping to develop reusable solutions for worldwide local government organisations.
Software developed enables citizens' action, for example:
- Online complaint forms
- Publishing job vacancies
- Associations’ directory
Other software specifically targets those working for the associations:
- Support for writing business letters
- Project management support
Track record of sharing
The PloneGov initiative is a collaborative software ecosystem. The larger the community that shares the applications, the more potential benefits derived by each participant. Thus, PloneGov has a very strong emphasis on fostering collaboration between organizations locally and internationally. All the activities taking place are focusing on reaching as many organizations as possible to share best practices, knowledge, methodologies, training and software.
This particular approach has been highlighted in the EU-funded “Public Sector And Open Source Software” report:
“The PloneGov model had a spatial and societal dimension right from the beginning, as it aims at integrating more and more municipalities and commercial partners across Europe” www.publicsectoross.info
Developing collaboration, knowledge and software sharing lies at core of all PloneGov activities. All stakeholders benefit from these activities as they focus on their expertise:
- In the Public Sector, PloneGov project leaders get support to promote their achievements within their own organizations and thus get additional support from their management.
- SME directly benefit from the overall “PloneGov” visibility and are enabled to reach new prospects.
PloneGov mechanisms for exchange and sharing:
- Raising Plone based eGovernment projects visibility: PloneGov enable open source experts from the public sector to raise their project visibility and connect with other experts. It has created an amazing pool of knowledge and expertise. In 2 years, PloneGov, its SubCommunities and collaborating projects have received 22 awards and nominations across Europe and the world.
- The information available on PloneGov.org site is focused on decision makers and projects leaders. It enables peer-to-peer Public Sector experts’ contacts. As a result it builds confidence on the technology, solutions and related investments independently from any commercial relationship.
- Collaboration with Researchers: PloneGov leaders maintain close interactions with EU funded research projects investigating the socio-economic aspects of collaborative models (Flossimpact, Public Sector and OS, Flossinclude), the quality of FLOSS software (Qualoss and Flossmetrics) and a EU thematic network to measure e-Government impact and user satisfaction measurements (eGovMoNet).
- Involvement in EU programs as OSOR (the IDABC open source observatory) participating to workshop, publishing articles and cases studies on ePractice. Collaborating with similar ventures taking place in other continents as GOCC (the US equivalent of OSOR), or speaker at Worldbank conference for promoting Open Source eGoverment in emerging economies.
- Workshops focusing on project coordination, software sharing and knowledge transfer. In its 2 years existence, a number of events were organized to foster international collaboration. Beside an active participation to the open source community regular events, a number of PloneGov specific workshops took place in Brussels, Bern, Sorrento (Italy), Dublin, Paris, Washington DC, Ferrara (Italy), Argentina and Morocco, and Senegal in July 2009.
- Promotion and dissemination: in charge of the international project dissemination Zea Partners team presented the PloneGov initiative to more than 70 conferences events over 15 countries in Europe, Africa and North America. These presentations were later relayed by open source advocates in South America (Argentina and Brazil) and Oceania (New Zealand and Australia).
- News and articles: 70 articles presenting the PloneGov initiative, the SubCommunties achievements and cases studies were published on plonegov.org. The same content was relayed on other sites reaching complementary audiences as the Public Sector on ePractice.eu, OSOR.eu; or the open source community and SME on zeapartners.org, plone.org and plone.net.
Lessons learnt
Benefits of a close collaboration between public sector, OS community and SMEs
PloneGov is the base of development for an innovative economic ecosystem including several actors as local governments, SME and an open source community. Together with SME, the community assumes part of the initial investment in term of free promotion, community events to build up confidence, coaching, transfer of knowledge, etc. Local governments on their part open a new, potentially important market to the SMEs.
- The involvement of SME has a positive impact on the PloneGov initiative. The development of a network of potential suppliers reduces the risk of dependency and speeds up regional and international dissemination.
- Public Sector and OS communities share similar values on collaboration and work done in the public interest. These values are key in developing a trustworthy environment between actors from different working environment (public sector, SME, OS Community).
Added value of collaboration (mutualisation)
A good knowledge of existing solutions avoids duplication of efforts. By pooling efforts, the technical coordination enables a better use of resources; reduce costs and speeds up results. The potential to attract new towns is big because over 100,000 EU towns and regions nearly all have the same needs.
- IT teams in local government are often small organizations with similar size to Floss SME. PloneGov facilitates collaboration between actors and the ability to exchange best practices from several backgrounds as local government, OS Community and SME. Results are a motivating working environment enabling innovation.
- In its early stage, PloneGov/CommunesPlone, while already involving 15 towns in 2 countries, had low financial risk compared to traditional IT projects. The seed funding totaled €40 000, dedicated to coaching/training on collaborative development. So far, financial resources result mostly from a better use of existing manpower (no additional budget) by pooling resources and focusing investment on a limited number of developments.
Difficulty to develop innovative approach within the public sector
The open source software model of development is new to the public sector and often misunderstood by it. A risk would be to under evaluate the work required to sustain and manage a growing mutualisation project. Some activities (such as coordination and training) should ideally be taken in charge by a central body. This body should ideally a non-profit to guarantee its independence from suppliers. A bottom up project may raise opposition from traditional top down administrative structure.
- To maintain independence from suppliers while building up a project open to collaboration, PloneGov was modeled on the Plone Community organization and development practices. A local SME was involved and coached the town IT team on collaborative development practices. As more towns joined the project they bring in additional expertise and gave visibility to the project.
- A key factor of success was to model the project practices on the experience of an open source community. As the projects grows, new skills will be needed (e.g. for managing an open source project, coaching a community) these skills are new for most PloneGov members as well as to the authorities supporting the project.
Plone and PloneGov are registered trademark of the Plone Foundation. Zope is a registered trademark of the Zope Foundation. Detailed information is provided on: http://plone.org/foundation and http://foundation.zope.org/