Impact
The subject of this project was to carry out a comparative analysis (not a benchmark) of the National Interoperability Frameworks (NIF)based on an analytical model and methodology in order to gain a structural snapshot of the various NIFs.
The main results of this project include:
- Detailed analysis of 14 countries using the NIFO Analytical Model;
- High-levelanalysis of 20 countries;
- New version of Analytical Model that is now populated with 14 countries in total;
- Discussion and analysis, both quantitative and qualitative, leading to interesting and valuable conclusions and recommendations;
NIFO is recognised as the aggregated information source for national interoperability - In addition to awareness, NIFOshould be recognized as the prime information source regarding national interoperability. In other words, it should be obvious for targeted stakeholders, if they need specific information in the NIF context, they know where to find the information and recognize the NIFO as an important information- and best practices source. In order to create momentum and continuity, the added value of the NIFO should be clear for all targeted stakeholders. Foreseen benefits (e.g. insight, information sharing, best practices) should be communicated clearly.
NIFO is recognized to stimulate consistency and interoperability between the European public administrations - It is considered important that the national interoperability frameworks are not deviating between each other in addressing various aspects of achieving interoperability. A deviation can result in interoperability difficulties on a European-level in general. For these reasons, interaction and discussion (communication) between national experts is an important driver for maturity and growth of interoperability. Communicating that national interoperability frameworks should be aligned as much as possible with the European Interoperability Framework, is therefore an important communication goal.
Track record of sharing
This action is all about the sharing of information about the National Interoperability Initiaves between EU public Administrations.Â
Lessons learnt
The activities linked up with the NIFO objectives have been carried out in two stages:
- Stage 1:conception, modeling and demonstration
- Stage 2:data collection, data analysis and finalization.
This iterative approach has been chosen from the onset to the first focus on developing a comparative model and applying it to a limited number of countries. This was covered in Stage 1 of the NIFO project, which was executed successfully from December 2008 to April 2009.
Multiple expert group sessions have resulted in a well-structured yet pragmatic Analytical Model that has formed the basis for Stage 2. The focus of Stage 2 of the NIFO has been on covering the remaining countries in scope and analyzing them with the Analytical Model. Stage 2 has been carried out from October 2009 to January 2010.
In this study, 14 countries that have a published NIF have been analysed in detail using the NIFO Analytical Model. The remaining 20 countries have been analysed at a higher level, resulting in a fact sheet per country. The key conclusions after comparative analysis, for each of the three perspectives in the Analytical Model, are:
1) Perspective Context & Principles
- Significant progress on interoperability can only be achieved by taking all contextual factors into account;
- Communication and creating awareness is a key factor in order to create momentum;
- Measurement of interoperability effectiveness is needed in order to demonstrate the added value
Â
2) PerspectiveInteroperability
- Mandating interoperability with a legislative framework is difficult but effective;
- Organisational interoperability is covered only rarely. Countries tend to emphasize semantic and technical levels of interoperability, which actually are only enablers for organisational interoperability.
Â
3) PerspectiveServicesSupport
- Well defined,transparent lifecycle management of the NIF and the creation of a community around the NIF are critical success factors for full NIF maturity and adoption.