go to home page | go to navigation | go to page content | go to contact | go to sitemap
Home > Liverpool City Council, eGovernment Transformation
practice Liverpool City Council, eGovernment Transformation
Img-AdwardAward finalist 2009

Liverpool City Council, eGovernment Transformation

2327 Visits
| 1 Comments |
starstarempty starempty starempty starIn order to vote, you need to be logged in!

Acronym of the case:

LCCEGT

Web address of the case:

Country of the case:

United Kingdom

City/region:

Liverpool

Posting Date:

2 October 2009

Last Edited Date:

30 October 2009

Author:

Kelly McConville (Liverpool City Council )
Liverpool City Council, eGovernment Transformation  Logoldl's picture
Award finalist 2009

Type of initiative

  • Strategic initiative-imgStrategic initiative

Case Abstract

Liverpool City Council demonstrates how a poorly performing organisation has been transformed through the use of technology to benefit the citizens of Liverpool. 

In 2001 all Council services were poorly performing, the third-poorest in the country and all in the bottom quartile of local government measures (as monitored by ‘Key Performance Indicators, KPI’s).  Indeed a ‘Deloitte and Touche’  Best Value Review found: 

·          investment was limited, wasteful, uncoordinated and ineffective

·          no ethos of customer service

·          quality not ingrained into the fabric of services

·          absence of performance management

·          low levels of motivation or employee engagement.

Additionally, Liverpool had for many years, been designated an area of economic deprivation with a distorted percentage of its population requiring access to local government services, particularly the social benefits.

Summary of where we were: 

·          Poor performance in many areas, uncertain prospects for a way forward

·          Expenditure well exceeding budget

·          Complicated Customer Contact arrangements incorporating too many sites and staff, with poor inter-departmental communication.

·          Uncertain standards, and levels of response

·          Limited IT systems led to inefficient processes (e.g. dual keying of data), inconsistent data recording, and a lack of suitably available information.

·          Stifled innovation

·          Lack of clarity in targets

·          An under-developed e-strategy

It was therefore imperative that a change of direction be taken to address these issues.

Where we are now:               

·          Three million customer contacts handled each year

·          Higher performance in all areas

·          95.5% of calls answered within 20 seconds with 90% First Point Of Contact resolution with 94% Customer Satisfaction Levels

·          Single point of contact centre established providing high levels of first point of contact resolution and customer satisfaction

·          Integrated IT systems to enhance support given to our external and internal clients needs

·          Effective Performance Monitoring

·          24/7 operation

·          Established service levels

·          IT and telephony systems have improved as a result of concentration of networks, with more effective and relevant information captured and delivered to the relevant service provider.

·          An innovation culture whereby staff are actively encouraged to propose enhancements to service based on experience.

Each of these demonstrates how LCC has developed the use of high quality technology and people to empower citizens whilst improving access to public services using an innovative joint venture solution within local government in the UK.

Please refer to additional documentation.

Description of the case

Start date - End date
July 2001 (Ongoing)
Date operational
January 2001
Target Users
Citizen
Target Users Description

Please refer to additional documentation.

Scope
Local (city or municipality)
Language(s)
English

Policy Context and Legal Framework

Please refer to additional documentation.

Project Size and Implementation

Type of initiative
IT infrastructures and products
Overall Implementation approach
Partnerships between administration and/or private sector and/or non-profit sector
Technology choice
Proprietary technology
Funding source

Implementation and Management Approach

Please refer to additional documentation.

Technology solution

Please refer to additional documentation.

Multimedia Content Select a Tab

There isn't any image for this case
There isn't any Video for this case

Showing 1 comment

Very good

07 October 2009 | 2933 Visits | Rating: 2 (maximum:5)
I have visited the site, she pleases me well. The layout and graphics are nice and it is easy to use.

 

In order to send a message you need to be registered at least one month and have earned more than 150 kudos.

Additional Documents

go to the SEMIC web page
eGovernment