Impact
IWS prevents corruption, given that the concerned party cannot bring any objection for the
failure of meeting, forgetting or overlooking a particular requirement after the warning made. The performance and quality of inspections can be enhanced as every process and warnings are logged by the system and submitted to the inspectors. Nothing is more damaging for the judiciary than duplicated orders, the admission of legal mistakes and the inability to obey all procedural rules. These reminders help judges, prosecutors and judicial staff feel confident while doing their jobs without feeling any pressure not to make mistakes. IWS is allowing judges to do their main job more quickly and effectively, preventing delays and inefficiencies. It helps deal with growing complexities of litigation and preserves the basic principle of the judiciary; fairness, thoroughness, consistency, and acceptability.
IWS produces some notices in labels on the screen to suggest some proposals or recommend some jobs to the users whenever they want or at important situations by evaluating data files. Owing to IWS, there has been a significant decrease in the number of cases returned from Supreme Court because of proceeding errors. The aims of the IWS are to prevent procedural errors during legal proceeding, to minimise other possible errors, to provide accuracy and speed to the legal proceedings and to accumulate public trust in justice.
For example, IWS provides warnings if an escapee's personal information is entered to the system no matter where he comes from before any judicial unit for any kind of aim in Turkey. In the past, courts were not able to know whether the person before them is arrested by a warrant issued by another court. If the IWS does not exist, fugitives might have escaped from justice. Warrants about fugitives can be recognized by all units of judiciary instantly and it became very easy to catch them when they come before any judicial authority. Thanks to integration with birth registry database, the death of one of the parties of cases is recognized by IWS. Afterwards, the judges are warned to consider the death event during the case. If the offender has a previous crime, IWS also warns judges not to ignore this issue.
Track record of sharing
IWS works within UYAP case and document management system, which is a part of e-justice system in Turkey. These components are completely transferable to other countries. So, it is completely possible to import IWS to other European courts.
Lessons learnt
Overall, IWS has enhanced the quality of services provided to citizens and the effectiveness of justice. As a result public confidence has been achieved in justice services thanks to impeccable justice, aiding stability and peace in society. Article 6(1) of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), as well as Article 47 of the European Charter of Fundamental Rights mention: 'The right to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal established by law'. IWS contributes to the observance of this right by enabling judges to deliver their decisions swiftly without making any procedural mistakes. The reasons for the judicial mistakes are ranging from the enormous workload toinadequate training. Legal procedures were complicated and disorganized. IWS help judges, prosecutors and judicial staff tackle these complicated proceedings and not to neglect any obligatory issues in the complex legal processes. In this way accountability for justice management is enhanced.