Impact
The impact of e-Services on the various target groups is outlined below. The volume of transactions made on line has been sustained over years for the corporate tax returns, services for employers and payments processing.
Corporate Taxpayers
Nearly all Tax Practitioners use the services available for Corporate Taxpayers. Furthermore the information gathered on the Financial Statements of all companies is uniform and structured such that proper analysis of accounting ratios can be done consistently and with little risk of interpretation or error in capture by the users. The preprogrammed spreadsheet prevents most errors as information is not exported. The use of the service is as follows:
| 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009* |
Number of Returns | 1,780 | 4,417 | 13,035 | 14,094 | 14,683 | 14,998 | 13,958 | 1,780 |
Manual Return | 16,335 | 12,668 | 3,711 | 3,043 | 3,012 | 3,241 | 3,279 | 853 |
% Returns submitted Online | 10 | 26 | 78 | 82 | 83 | 82 | 81 | 68 |
Number of Tax Return & Financial Statement Transaction | 112624 | 281066 | 821315 | 877165 | 904815 | 910111 | 870834 | 82217 |
Number of Correction forms of online forms | 38 | 30 | 66 | 63 | 43 | 27 | 15 | * |
*Deadline is 21 November 2009.
Tax Practitioners made the number of enquiries on taxpayer accounts of their clients as shown below:
Viewing Account | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 |
Number of Companies | 398 | 1050 | 3143 | 4685 | 5599 | 5801 | 5318 | 2775 |
Count of Instances | 666 | 2,158 | 6,002 | 9,629 | 11,616 | 20,614 | 32,859 | 11,500 |
This data represents the number of taxpayers whose account information (statements, payments etc) was viewed by their Tax Practitioner. The instances of viewing count each time an information screen has been view by the taxpayer.
e-TPS Taxpayer Services
Tax Practitioners also submitted 2343 Registration for Refund using the e-TPS application since April 2008.
Employers
The number employers in the target sector who submit employee end of year information online increase year on year.
The number of errors represents errors that were corrected online by employers rather than at the back office of the Inland Revenue, hence improving the quality of information.
| 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | *2008 |
Number of Employers filing (from target market) | 668 | 1026 | 1062 | 1186 | 1374 | 1271 |
% FS7 filed online | 59 | 69 | 69 | 73 | 68 | 60 |
Total Number of Target Segment | 1127 | 1489 | 1550 | 1633 | 2030 | 2102 |
Number of Employees (FS3s ) effected | 54142 | 63246 | 73479 | 79105 | 89157 | 81072 |
Number of Errors in Online Sub | 190989 | 161791 | 194614 | 233058 | 187812 | 121457 |
*2008 cycle still in progress
Service related to submission of engagement and termination forms to Inland Revenue and Employment and Training Corporation has been implemented since May 2009 and no information is available.
Information about payments made by employers is included in the Payment data below.
Data Providers to Assist Taxpayers
During January 2009 the Inland Revenue launched an online service for the 165 (private schools, child-care, language schools, elderly homes, and agricultural payors). 8 providers used the service to submit online over the Internet. Another 138 provided the information on magnetic media. Total number of records submitted amounts to 18368, out of which 744 were received online.
Individual Taxpayers
Non Filers
As the Inland Revenue enabled businesses to submit information about taxpayers online, faster turnaround times to process information and better quality information made it possible for the Inland Revenue to process electronically the Tax Statements of individual taxpayers without the need for these taxpayers to submit any information to the Department. Initiated during 2007 this initiative has produced the following results:
Year | Non Filer | Tax Return | Correction Forms | Returns issued after Non Filer |
2007 | 135,625 (56%) | 106,178 | 1735 (1.28%) | 2683 (2%) |
2008 | 172,434 (70%) | 73,757 | 1657 (0.96%) | 2450 (1.42%) |
2009 | 181,345 (72%) | 71,688 | * | * |
* 2009 in progress
Thus for 2008 (the last complete year), Inland Revenue managed to identify the income and deductions of 70% of the taxpayers with less than 1% error rate in information (Correction Forms) and with 1.42% of taxpayers requesting a Tax Return to declare additional information.
Tax Return Filing
| 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | *2009 |
Number of Returns | 10 | 235 | 925 | 460 | 210 |
% online | 0 | 0.50 | 1 | 1 | * |
Correction Forms | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | * |
* 2009 is in progress
Taxpayer Account Views
| 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 |
Unique Taxpayer references | 530 | 5924 | 6765 | 3505 |
Instances of viewing | 3216 | 28606 | 42131 | 14650 |
This data represents the number of taxpayers who viewed their account information (statements, payments etc). The instances of viewing count each time an information screen has been viewed by the taxpayer or tax practitioner.
Payments
This analysis represents all payment types of tax and social security contributions. Payments are on the increase year on year. Inland Revenue provides online payments which are processed through a Government Payment Gateway (GPG). Taxpayers can also effect payments using the web sites of their commercial banks (Internet Banking - IBK).
| | Year |
| | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009* |
| GPG | Payment Count | 1,925 | 3,149 | 3,765 | 4,922 | 6604 | 1,553 |
| Amounts (EUR) | 1,268,025 | 1,507,085 | 1,685,773 | 2,230,360 | 2,724,986 | 700,209 |
| IBK | Payment Count | | 5,407 | 7,300 | 10,567 | 14479 | 4782 |
| Amounts (EUR) | | 25,833,015 | 33,227,742 | 48,742,329 | 63,040,026 | 27,517,461 |
Total Payments | 1,925 | 8,556 | 11,065 | 15,489 | 21,083 | 6,335 |
Total Amounts (EUR) | 1,268,025 | 27,340,100 | 34,913,515 | 50,972,689 | 65,765,013 | 28,217,669 |
Total number of payments received | 323,584 | 310,830 | 316,327 | 306,678 | 302,909 | 100,391 |
% online | 1 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 6 |
* Up to May 2009
Notaries
Since June 2007, only 20 transfer forms have been received online.
Peak Usage
Services are monitored annually to ensure that during peak usage the response times are still prompt such that quality of service is maintained throughout the service period. The two most used services are those of companies and employers end of year submission whose peak usage (test and actual submissions) in a particular day usually the deadline submission date is:
| 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 |
Corporate Tax | 130 | 368 | 823 | 1343 | 1393 | 1767 | 2170 | * |
Employers | - | - | 361 | 444 | 483 | 563 | 532 | 644 |
* deadline is 21 November 2009
Track record of sharing
The project was described in detail within the document ‘Implementing Computerisation and Information Technology for Tax Administration’ issued in 2007 by the Commonwealth Association of Tax Administrators (CATA) ISBN 978-0-9553540-2-1.
This publication offers guidance to revenue agencies that are thinking of implementing computerisation or information technology to improve the efficiency of their tax administration. It draws on the experience of Australia, Malaysia, Malta, Pakistan, Singapore and Tanzania, representing a range of information technology initiatives of varying scales, complexity and levels of maturity. Rather than look at overall conceptual issues, which are already well covered elsewhere, this book looks at the finer details of implementation in order to identify lessons, ideas and opportunities, both at the planning and design phase, and during implementation and review and evaluation.
Project experience is also shared when exchange visits are made with Tax Authorities of European Union member states under the FISCALIS framework. Such visits have been made with Tax Authorities of Sweden, United Kingdom, Republic of Ireland and Finland.
The experience was also shared with delegations who visit MITA for fact finding visits, such as a recent one from St Lucia. Similar approach to implementation was also recommended in a consultancy assignment the project team had with the Office of the Tax Commissioner in Bermuda.
The development team has been invited to deliver a presentation at the local Developer Days 2009 conference. DevDays 2009 is an event for all developers, architects and other IT specialists who would like to learn more about particular technologies, products and best practice approaches. They were asked to share with other industry professionals their experience in implementing an Office Business Application at the Inland Revenue Department.
Within MITA, the project team is held in high esteem due to its success of the e-Services delivered and is usually the benchmark for the implementation of innovative ideas in the development or operational platforms.
Lessons learnt
· Senior management must own the project and commit resources to the project from the outset.
· The Re-engineering of the business (BPR) was crucial to the success of the project; the alternative to re-structuring and standardisation would have been the filing of images or word-processed documents within the system which would have added no value to the Tax Return submission process.
· BPR of the Tax Return process showed that by enabling the businesses to fulfil their tax obligations online, the other (e.g. employed) taxpayer population could also benefit by removing the requirement to file tax returns when information about incomes and deductions is known by Inland Revenue.
· The initial target audience i.e. Tax practitioners and large employers were the ideal innovators who used the system; they gave very good publicity to the e-services amongst their clients and colleagues.
· The participation of Inland Revenue and MITA in information sessions given out by Audit firms to their clients helped in the propagation of a positive perception towards e-Government. The audience was presented with how the services will support their tax practitioners in giving them improved services.
· Another important factor in the successful implementation of IR Services On-Line was the establishment of the Web Services Help Desk.
· Critical to the implementation were the hands on sessions carried out at Inland Revenue with the audit firms and employers. Actions such as installation of digital certificates, logging in and using the secure site were shown to be doable by the target audience and hence were accepted.
· Implementation of multi channels by allowing submission through either website or spreadsheets and in the case of payments using online web page and Internet Banking provides taxpayers with options that best fits their work practices, hence increasing service use.
· There is great value in learning from others. The technical visits and the European Union assistance project provided important guidance to the project team who made significant breakthroughs throughout the whole implementation.
· The perception of a secure and reliable site (e.g. use of PKI, SSL) and other security enhancing mechanisms) was a huge factor in the take-up of the service.
· The technologies chosen for deployment must be confirmed (prior to project development) to be interoperable to allow for project evolution and scalability.
· Implementing spreadsheets provided end users a familiar interface used in everyday work. This resulted in a higher acceptance of e-services. The familiarity with spreadsheets reduced the pressure on technical and end user support helpdesks.
· It is important to present a complete package of services. The e-service for notaries needs supporting e-services (including other organisations) to achieve success.
· On-Line Tax Return filing of individuals has not taken off due to problems in making available e-ID and due to the fact that Tax Returns are not issued early enough (due to backdated initiatives) such that a proper publicity campaign can be launched.