go to home page | go to navigation | go to page content | go to contact | go to sitemap
Home > Cases > eHealth Procurers Forum > National policies for EHR implementation in the European area
practice National policies for EHR implementation in the European area

National policies for EHR implementation in the European area

1751 Visits
| 0 Comments |
starstarstarempty starempty starIn order to vote, you need to be logged in!

Acronym of the case:

EHR-IMPLEMENT

Web address of the case:

Country of the case:

Belgium , Denmark , France , Greece , Ireland , Slovenia , United Kingdom

Posting Date:

5 March 2010

Last Edited Date:

15 March 2010

Author:

National policies for EHR implementation in the European area LogoESTERLE's picture
Editor's Choice 2010

Type of initiative

  • Project or service-imgProject or service

Case Abstract

Implementation of Electronic Health Records (EHR) at a national level constitutes a radical innovation for health care. Along with technical challenges, EHR implementations face several political, social and organizational issues which are often overlooked. Acknowledging that EHR success needs to engage all stakeholders, manage organizational changes and alleviate resistance, EHR-IMPLEMENT aims at examining political, social and organizational factors influencing large scale EHR implementations, and at identifying best practices.

Through a case study approach, the project will perform an in-depth comparison and assessment of six national EHR initiatives, and will conduct a survey focused on EHR implementation strategy and actions on European level. Overall, EHR-IMPLEMENT will engage high level scientific experts and national authorities into knowledge exchanges, and formulate recommendations facilitating the dissemination of EHR among the European Members and Associated States and assisting the European Union in achieving its eHealth objectives.

Description of the case

Domain
Sector
Start date - End date
May 2007 (Ongoing)
Date operational
May 2007
Target Users
General public | Health authorities | Health professionals
Target Users Description

All stakeholders involved in EHR implementation and use are target users: national and European authorities, physicians and other health professionals, patients and general public.Industrialists and researchers are also concerned by our investigations and recommendations.

Scope
National | Pan-European
Status
Operation
Language(s)
English

Policy Context and Legal Framework

The EHR implementation would lead to several benefits such as a significant costs reduction - due to fact that duplicate exams would be avoided - an improvement of the continuity of care facilitate by the possibility of sharing patient health history records among providers and across institutions, the merging and the consolidation of health databases, thus enhancing patient empowerment and supporting scientific research.

However, EHR implementation faces several challenges including interoperability, data privacy, safety and confidentiality, standardization but also complex socio-cultural and organizational issues. Several failed implementation initiatives in eHealth have been attributed to a non sufficient attention toward organizational changes leading to innovation. To address these issues, eHealth systems must be treated as ‘socio-technical’ applications. Successful EHR implementations and long term sustainability at a broad scale must consider political, organizational and social factors which are difficult to manage by policy and decision makers. The implementation of EHR at national level is mainly a political issue; the process starts with a political vision followed by a political decision, then by an implementation plan and finally by practical use.

Past experiences have shown that the political vision, as it progressively evolves along the process, results in a final implementation which is often far from the initial vision. EHR implementation is similar to the introduction of a major management innovation. The main phases of the project development would be: political decision, definition of objectives and conditions, negotiations for the technical object, adjustments following pilot implementations and finally, production level national and regional implementation.

Within this process, there are differences among the countries for what concerns models of governance, legislation and regulation needs, methods of communication and training, etc. In addition, being a dynamic and very complex process, EHR implementation involves a great number of actors including decision makers, health officers, engineers and users. EHR long term success and sustainability requires a deep cultural change where the main obstacle is the health professionals' resistance. Combining qualitative and quantitative methodologies, EHR-IMPLEMENT aims at making recommendations for policy, strategy and action plans for EHR national implementations in European countries as well as providing general lessons to be taken into account at the European policy level.

Project Size and Implementation

Type of initiative
Awareness-raising information
Overall Implementation approach
Public administration
Technology choice
Not applicable/not available
Funding source
Public funding EU | Public funding national | Public funding local
Project size
Implementation: €500-999,000

Implementation and Management Approach

The specific objectives of the project are:

  • Developing a common methodological framework for analysis and comparison of EHR implementations at national level. The framework will take into consideration:
    • The national health system of each country: European countries differ significantly in the organization of national health systems, therefore, specific knowledge of National health systems is necessary to understand and interpret policy, strategy and practice decisions and approaches adopted in each country;
    • National policy and strategy regarding eHealth to be used as the background for case analysis;
    • The EHR definitions and components adopted in each country as many differences may exist at the technical, functional, and user levels. A typology will be elaborated starting from EHR specific functions tracing the evolution in time between the initial vision and the final implemented product. This step is essential for the comparison analysis between case studies;
    • The process of implementation including the initial vision, the overall motivation and objectives, the governance of the process and its institutional design, the actors involved, the funding, legal and regulatory measures accompanying the process, and the role and the participation of EHR users including citizens and physicians.
  • Delivering six national case reports with an in-depth description and assessment of the National EHR implementation process, followed by a strategic evaluation and identification of key issues, weaknesses and strengths of the process, difficulties encountered and solutions adopted. National case analysis will be performed in the context of national health system organizations and national eHealth policies.
  • Comparing the national cases and identifying differences and similarities in the approaches across countries, to highlight best practices and propose recommendations for addressing political, organizational and social issues. Key factors influencing implementation processes will be identified with the participation of health authorities representatives.
  • Producing a survey focused on policy and action plans of National EHR implementation across European Member States. The questionnaire will take into account the results of the in-depth analyses.
  • Providing policy recommendations and disseminating the results at national and European levels among policy makers, national health authorities, various health care and R&D actors, EHR providers, patients and citizens representatives.

Multimedia Content Select a Tab

There isn't any image for this case
There isn't any Video for this case
In order to send a message you need to be registered at least one month and have earned more than 150 kudos.
go to the SEMIC web page
eGovernment