go to home page | go to navigation | go to page content | go to contact | go to sitemap
Home > Cases > eGovernment across borders > European Approaches to Inter-Generational Lifelong Learning
practice European Approaches to Inter-Generational Lifelong Learning

European Approaches to Inter-Generational Lifelong Learning

1943 Visits
| Comments |
starstarstarempty starempty starIn order to vote, you need to be logged in!

Acronym of the case:

EAGLE

Web address of the case:

Country of the case:

Finland , Germany , Greece

Posting Date:

9 April 2008

Last Edited Date:

07 January 2010

Author:

Joe Cullen (Tavistock Institute)
European Approaches to Inter-Generational Lifelong Learning LogoJoeC's picture
Editor's Choice 2008

Type of initiative

  • Project or service-imgProject or service
  • Network-imgNetwork

Case Abstract

EAGLE is an ‘Observatory’ project, supported under the EC Grundtvig Programme that is collecting, analysing and showcasing examples of inter-generational learning. Many of the examples entail the use of ICTs to support collaborative working and knowledge creation between generations. This will lead to the formulation, selection and implementation of European action research based pilot experimentation. These experiments throughout Europe will test new ways of promoting inter-generational learning.

Description of the case

Domain
Start date - End date
January 2007 (Ongoing)
Date operational
January 2007
Target Users
Older people (60+) | Young people at risk of marginalisation
Target Users Description

Families, older people, young people, commercial enterprises, NGOs, Governments.

Scope
International
Status
Research
Language(s)
English | German | Spanish

Policy Context and Legal Framework

EAGLE wants to generate insight into the following areas:
- Firstly, the potential as well as the limitations of trans-, inter-generational and later life formal and informal learning.
- Secondly, the policies, concepts, analyses, frameworks, experiences in place and empirical evidence available.
- Thirdly, the models of good practice developed; those good practice cases which are likely to be generalised, transferred, localised and useful to generate policy and practice recommendations; the criteria to systematically identify their related strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats combined into a consistent description framework of good practice cases based on a consensual grid and terminology useful to describe cases of practice in a way they can be compared across different fields, different participating age groups, different types of interactions etc.

Project Size and Implementation

Type of initiative
Inclusive services of general interest
Overall Implementation approach
Partnerships between administration and/or private sector and/or non-profit sector
Technology choice
Open source software
Funding source
Public funding EU
Project size
Implementation: €300-499,000
Yearly cost:
€49-299,000

Implementation and Management Approach

Partnership with 10 core partners; associated partners from government and community-based organisations

Impact, innovation and results

Impact

Based on desk, field and action research-based analysis and piloting activities, EAGLE aims finally at setting up a dialogue including researchers, developers, implementation practitioners, age group representatives, policy consultants and policy makers to support exchange of ideas and experiences across existing fragmentations and therefore to contribute and to encourage new, innovative and alternative learning pathways of (adult) education.

This dialogue should develop into sustainable professional and non-professional Communities of Practice. Examples of inter-generational eLearning covered by the project include the following: Tandems and e-Twinning of younger and older professionals through Social Software in the automobile industry, banking sector, handicraft enterprises, and Sixty Plus Intergenerational Projects.

EAGLE is testing pedagogic and e-Learning methods to support intergenerational learning including the development, verification and validation of the ‘EAGLE Toolkit for Intergenerational Activities’ in ‘real life’ intergenerational learning settings. More specifically the impact of EAGLE will be:
- Insight into the potential and the limitations of intergenerational learning;
- Insight the policies, concepts, frameworks in place and empirical evidence available;
- Insight into the models of good (and less successful) practices;
- Multidimensional analysis of ‘what works with whom under which circumstances’;
- Formulation of policy and practice recommendations;
- Piloting and validating a set of intergenerational ‘learning sets’ and a ‘practical toolkit’ for practitioners;
- Supporting the exchange of ideas and experiences of learning between the generations;
- Creating professional dialogue between researchers, developers, practitioners, age group representatives, policy consultants and policy makers;
- Encouraging innovative and alternative learning pathways of Lifelong and Life-wide Learning;
- Supporting the intergenerational contract in private and professional lives of European citizens.

Track record of sharing

Presentation of EAGLE in 12 national and international conferences e.g. EDEN Annual Conference 2007 & 2008; International Intergenerational Conference of CIP; eTwinning Conference; ECER 2008; ISA Forum of Sociology 2008; continuous involvement in national and international as well as offline and online (i.e. through the EAGLE portal) networking and exchange practices.

Lessons learnt

Lesson 1 - The multidimensional policy and practice analysis of EAGLE demonstrates that the benefits of intergenerational learning are many, such as: uniting segregated generations and building better understanding; encouraging active citizenship and social participation, and encouraging cross-generational working.

Lesson 2 - The positive effects of intergenerational learning are partly counterbalanced by possible ‘pitfalls’, which should be addressed when setting up intergenerational activities: the traps of ‘Homogeneous Groups', of ‘Life Worlds’, of different ‘Identities’, of different ‘Pedagogies’, of different ‘Values’, of different ‘Perceptions & Cognitive Processing’, of Sustainability and the trap of ‘One-size-fits-all’ Solution.

Multimedia Content Select a Tab

There isn't any image for this case
There isn't any Video for this case
In order to send a message you need to be registered at least one month and have earned more than 150 kudos.

Additional Documents

go to the SEMIC web page
eGovernment