go to home page | go to navigation | go to page content | go to contact | go to sitemap
practice

The ePractice blog: discuss, praise, disagree.

ePractice.eu provides its members with a blog in which all registered users can post opinions, questions and links to news related to eGovernment, eInclusion and eHealth. Your point of view is what makes ePractice.eu relevant to other public administrators all over Europe, so feel free to post and...

21 April 2009 | 3183 Visits | Rating: 3.5 (maximum:5)

environmental democracy

Public participation in environmental decision making has become in the last decades the goal of different recommendations and declarations at the international level, elaborated by the European Union.

The Ã…rhus Convention entitles the public - individuals and environmental organisations - to participate in environmental decision-making. This

means that public authorities have to inform them in time of relevant proposals, so that they can submit their comments. These comments need to be taken into consideration. The authorities are also required to inform the public of their final decisions and the underlying reasons.

Under the Ã…rhus Convention, public authorities are obliged to organize, make accessible and disseminate the environmental information in their possession. This means they are obliged to keep and share the environmental information relevant to their functions, such as the quality of water, air and the atmosphere, land and biological diversity; energy, noise, development plans and policies; and the effects of these on human health, safety and the environment. This information has to be made accessible and disseminated, for example by putting it on the Internet, informing the media or using other channels of communication.

Environmental democracy is subject of the Aarhus Convention that goes to the heart of the relationship between people and governments. The Convention is not only an environmental agreement; it is also a Convention about government accountability, transparency and responsiveness.

15 June 2009

Local aspect of environmental democracy

Aarhus Convention looks like a helpful one but I believe the direct and indirect impact of the convention, like the previous ones, to the local environmental policies at the national and regional level, too.  

The ePractice blog: discuss, praise, disagree.

ePractice.eu provides its members with a blog in which all registered users can post opinions, questions and links to news related to eGovernment, eInclusion and eHealth. Your point of view is what makes ePractice.eu relevant to other public administrators all over Europe, so feel free to post and...

21 April 2009 | 3184 Visits | Rating: 3.5 (maximum:5)

environmental democracy

Public participation in environmental decision making has become in the last decades the goal of different recommendations and declarations at the international level, elaborated by the European Union.

The Ã…rhus Convention entitles the public - individuals and environmental organisations - to participate in environmental decision-making. This

means that public authorities have to inform them in time of relevant proposals, so that they can submit their comments. These comments need to be taken into consideration. The authorities are also required to inform the public of their final decisions and the underlying reasons.

Under the Ã…rhus Convention, public authorities are obliged to organize, make accessible and disseminate the environmental information in their possession. This means they are obliged to keep and share the environmental information relevant to their functions, such as the quality of water, air and the atmosphere, land and biological diversity; energy, noise, development plans and policies; and the effects of these on human health, safety and the environment. This information has to be made accessible and disseminated, for example by putting it on the Internet, informing the media or using other channels of communication.

Environmental democracy is subject of the Aarhus Convention that goes to the heart of the relationship between people and governments. The Convention is not only an environmental agreement; it is also a Convention about government accountability, transparency and responsiveness.

15 June 2009

Local aspect of environmental democracy

Aarhus Convention looks like a helpful one but I believe the direct and indirect impact of the convention, like the previous ones, to the local environmental policies at the national and regional level, too.  

The ePractice blog: discuss, praise, disagree.

ePractice.eu provides its members with a blog in which all registered users can post opinions, questions and links to news related to eGovernment, eInclusion and eHealth. Your point of view is what makes ePractice.eu relevant to other public administrators all over Europe, so feel free to post and...

21 April 2009 | 3185 Visits | Rating: 3.5 (maximum:5)

environmental democracy

Public participation in environmental decision making has become in the last decades the goal of different recommendations and declarations at the international level, elaborated by the European Union.

The Ã…rhus Convention entitles the public - individuals and environmental organisations - to participate in environmental decision-making. This

means that public authorities have to inform them in time of relevant proposals, so that they can submit their comments. These comments need to be taken into consideration. The authorities are also required to inform the public of their final decisions and the underlying reasons.

Under the Ã…rhus Convention, public authorities are obliged to organize, make accessible and disseminate the environmental information in their possession. This means they are obliged to keep and share the environmental information relevant to their functions, such as the quality of water, air and the atmosphere, land and biological diversity; energy, noise, development plans and policies; and the effects of these on human health, safety and the environment. This information has to be made accessible and disseminated, for example by putting it on the Internet, informing the media or using other channels of communication.

Environmental democracy is subject of the Aarhus Convention that goes to the heart of the relationship between people and governments. The Convention is not only an environmental agreement; it is also a Convention about government accountability, transparency and responsiveness.

15 June 2009

Local aspect of environmental democracy

Aarhus Convention looks like a helpful one but I believe the direct and indirect impact of the convention, like the previous ones, to the local environmental policies at the national and regional level, too.  

The ePractice blog: discuss, praise, disagree.

ePractice.eu provides its members with a blog in which all registered users can post opinions, questions and links to news related to eGovernment, eInclusion and eHealth. Your point of view is what makes ePractice.eu relevant to other public administrators all over Europe, so feel free to post and...

21 April 2009 | 3186 Visits | Rating: 3.5 (maximum:5)

environmental democracy

Public participation in environmental decision making has become in the last decades the goal of different recommendations and declarations at the international level, elaborated by the European Union.

The Ã…rhus Convention entitles the public - individuals and environmental organisations - to participate in environmental decision-making. This

means that public authorities have to inform them in time of relevant proposals, so that they can submit their comments. These comments need to be taken into consideration. The authorities are also required to inform the public of their final decisions and the underlying reasons.

Under the Ã…rhus Convention, public authorities are obliged to organize, make accessible and disseminate the environmental information in their possession. This means they are obliged to keep and share the environmental information relevant to their functions, such as the quality of water, air and the atmosphere, land and biological diversity; energy, noise, development plans and policies; and the effects of these on human health, safety and the environment. This information has to be made accessible and disseminated, for example by putting it on the Internet, informing the media or using other channels of communication.

Environmental democracy is subject of the Aarhus Convention that goes to the heart of the relationship between people and governments. The Convention is not only an environmental agreement; it is also a Convention about government accountability, transparency and responsiveness.

15 June 2009

Local aspect of environmental democracy

Aarhus Convention looks like a helpful one but I believe the direct and indirect impact of the convention, like the previous ones, to the local environmental policies at the national and regional level, too.  

The ePractice blog: discuss, praise, disagree.

ePractice.eu provides its members with a blog in which all registered users can post opinions, questions and links to news related to eGovernment, eInclusion and eHealth. Your point of view is what makes ePractice.eu relevant to other public administrators all over Europe, so feel free to post and...

21 April 2009 | 3187 Visits | Rating: 3.5 (maximum:5)

environmental democracy

Public participation in environmental decision making has become in the last decades the goal of different recommendations and declarations at the international level, elaborated by the European Union.

The Ã…rhus Convention entitles the public - individuals and environmental organisations - to participate in environmental decision-making. This

means that public authorities have to inform them in time of relevant proposals, so that they can submit their comments. These comments need to be taken into consideration. The authorities are also required to inform the public of their final decisions and the underlying reasons.

Under the Ã…rhus Convention, public authorities are obliged to organize, make accessible and disseminate the environmental information in their possession. This means they are obliged to keep and share the environmental information relevant to their functions, such as the quality of water, air and the atmosphere, land and biological diversity; energy, noise, development plans and policies; and the effects of these on human health, safety and the environment. This information has to be made accessible and disseminated, for example by putting it on the Internet, informing the media or using other channels of communication.

Environmental democracy is subject of the Aarhus Convention that goes to the heart of the relationship between people and governments. The Convention is not only an environmental agreement; it is also a Convention about government accountability, transparency and responsiveness.

15 June 2009

Local aspect of environmental democracy

Aarhus Convention looks like a helpful one but I believe the direct and indirect impact of the convention, like the previous ones, to the local environmental policies at the national and regional level, too.  

The ePractice blog: discuss, praise, disagree.

ePractice.eu provides its members with a blog in which all registered users can post opinions, questions and links to news related to eGovernment, eInclusion and eHealth. Your point of view is what makes ePractice.eu relevant to other public administrators all over Europe, so feel free to post and...

21 April 2009 | 3188 Visits | Rating: 3.5 (maximum:5)

environmental democracy

Public participation in environmental decision making has become in the last decades the goal of different recommendations and declarations at the international level, elaborated by the European Union.

The Ã…rhus Convention entitles the public - individuals and environmental organisations - to participate in environmental decision-making. This

means that public authorities have to inform them in time of relevant proposals, so that they can submit their comments. These comments need to be taken into consideration. The authorities are also required to inform the public of their final decisions and the underlying reasons.

Under the Ã…rhus Convention, public authorities are obliged to organize, make accessible and disseminate the environmental information in their possession. This means they are obliged to keep and share the environmental information relevant to their functions, such as the quality of water, air and the atmosphere, land and biological diversity; energy, noise, development plans and policies; and the effects of these on human health, safety and the environment. This information has to be made accessible and disseminated, for example by putting it on the Internet, informing the media or using other channels of communication.

Environmental democracy is subject of the Aarhus Convention that goes to the heart of the relationship between people and governments. The Convention is not only an environmental agreement; it is also a Convention about government accountability, transparency and responsiveness.

15 June 2009

Local aspect of environmental democracy

Aarhus Convention looks like a helpful one but I believe the direct and indirect impact of the convention, like the previous ones, to the local environmental policies at the national and regional level, too.  

The ePractice blog: discuss, praise, disagree.

ePractice.eu provides its members with a blog in which all registered users can post opinions, questions and links to news related to eGovernment, eInclusion and eHealth. Your point of view is what makes ePractice.eu relevant to other public administrators all over Europe, so feel free to post and...

21 April 2009 | 3189 Visits | Rating: 3.5 (maximum:5)

environmental democracy

Public participation in environmental decision making has become in the last decades the goal of different recommendations and declarations at the international level, elaborated by the European Union.

The Ã…rhus Convention entitles the public - individuals and environmental organisations - to participate in environmental decision-making. This

means that public authorities have to inform them in time of relevant proposals, so that they can submit their comments. These comments need to be taken into consideration. The authorities are also required to inform the public of their final decisions and the underlying reasons.

Under the Ã…rhus Convention, public authorities are obliged to organize, make accessible and disseminate the environmental information in their possession. This means they are obliged to keep and share the environmental information relevant to their functions, such as the quality of water, air and the atmosphere, land and biological diversity; energy, noise, development plans and policies; and the effects of these on human health, safety and the environment. This information has to be made accessible and disseminated, for example by putting it on the Internet, informing the media or using other channels of communication.

Environmental democracy is subject of the Aarhus Convention that goes to the heart of the relationship between people and governments. The Convention is not only an environmental agreement; it is also a Convention about government accountability, transparency and responsiveness.

15 June 2009

Local aspect of environmental democracy

Aarhus Convention looks like a helpful one but I believe the direct and indirect impact of the convention, like the previous ones, to the local environmental policies at the national and regional level, too.  

The ePractice blog: discuss, praise, disagree.

ePractice.eu provides its members with a blog in which all registered users can post opinions, questions and links to news related to eGovernment, eInclusion and eHealth. Your point of view is what makes ePractice.eu relevant to other public administrators all over Europe, so feel free to post and...

21 April 2009 | 3190 Visits | Rating: 3.5 (maximum:5)

environmental democracy

Public participation in environmental decision making has become in the last decades the goal of different recommendations and declarations at the international level, elaborated by the European Union.

The Ã…rhus Convention entitles the public - individuals and environmental organisations - to participate in environmental decision-making. This

means that public authorities have to inform them in time of relevant proposals, so that they can submit their comments. These comments need to be taken into consideration. The authorities are also required to inform the public of their final decisions and the underlying reasons.

Under the Ã…rhus Convention, public authorities are obliged to organize, make accessible and disseminate the environmental information in their possession. This means they are obliged to keep and share the environmental information relevant to their functions, such as the quality of water, air and the atmosphere, land and biological diversity; energy, noise, development plans and policies; and the effects of these on human health, safety and the environment. This information has to be made accessible and disseminated, for example by putting it on the Internet, informing the media or using other channels of communication.

Environmental democracy is subject of the Aarhus Convention that goes to the heart of the relationship between people and governments. The Convention is not only an environmental agreement; it is also a Convention about government accountability, transparency and responsiveness.

15 June 2009

Local aspect of environmental democracy

Aarhus Convention looks like a helpful one but I believe the direct and indirect impact of the convention, like the previous ones, to the local environmental policies at the national and regional level, too.  

The ePractice blog: discuss, praise, disagree.

ePractice.eu provides its members with a blog in which all registered users can post opinions, questions and links to news related to eGovernment, eInclusion and eHealth. Your point of view is what makes ePractice.eu relevant to other public administrators all over Europe, so feel free to post and...

21 April 2009 | 3191 Visits | Rating: 3.5 (maximum:5)

environmental democracy

Public participation in environmental decision making has become in the last decades the goal of different recommendations and declarations at the international level, elaborated by the European Union.

The Ã…rhus Convention entitles the public - individuals and environmental organisations - to participate in environmental decision-making. This

means that public authorities have to inform them in time of relevant proposals, so that they can submit their comments. These comments need to be taken into consideration. The authorities are also required to inform the public of their final decisions and the underlying reasons.

Under the Ã…rhus Convention, public authorities are obliged to organize, make accessible and disseminate the environmental information in their possession. This means they are obliged to keep and share the environmental information relevant to their functions, such as the quality of water, air and the atmosphere, land and biological diversity; energy, noise, development plans and policies; and the effects of these on human health, safety and the environment. This information has to be made accessible and disseminated, for example by putting it on the Internet, informing the media or using other channels of communication.

Environmental democracy is subject of the Aarhus Convention that goes to the heart of the relationship between people and governments. The Convention is not only an environmental agreement; it is also a Convention about government accountability, transparency and responsiveness.

15 June 2009

Local aspect of environmental democracy

Aarhus Convention looks like a helpful one but I believe the direct and indirect impact of the convention, like the previous ones, to the local environmental policies at the national and regional level, too.  

The ePractice blog: discuss, praise, disagree.

ePractice.eu provides its members with a blog in which all registered users can post opinions, questions and links to news related to eGovernment, eInclusion and eHealth. Your point of view is what makes ePractice.eu relevant to other public administrators all over Europe, so feel free to post and...

21 April 2009 | 3192 Visits | Rating: 3.5 (maximum:5)

environmental democracy

Public participation in environmental decision making has become in the last decades the goal of different recommendations and declarations at the international level, elaborated by the European Union.

The Ã…rhus Convention entitles the public - individuals and environmental organisations - to participate in environmental decision-making. This

means that public authorities have to inform them in time of relevant proposals, so that they can submit their comments. These comments need to be taken into consideration. The authorities are also required to inform the public of their final decisions and the underlying reasons.

Under the Ã…rhus Convention, public authorities are obliged to organize, make accessible and disseminate the environmental information in their possession. This means they are obliged to keep and share the environmental information relevant to their functions, such as the quality of water, air and the atmosphere, land and biological diversity; energy, noise, development plans and policies; and the effects of these on human health, safety and the environment. This information has to be made accessible and disseminated, for example by putting it on the Internet, informing the media or using other channels of communication.

Environmental democracy is subject of the Aarhus Convention that goes to the heart of the relationship between people and governments. The Convention is not only an environmental agreement; it is also a Convention about government accountability, transparency and responsiveness.

15 June 2009

Local aspect of environmental democracy

Aarhus Convention looks like a helpful one but I believe the direct and indirect impact of the convention, like the previous ones, to the local environmental policies at the national and regional level, too.  

eGovernment