ePractice.eu provides its members with a blog in which all registered users can post opinions, questions and links to news related to eGovernment, eInclusion and eHealth. Your point of view is what makes ePractice.eu relevant to other public administrators all over Europe, so feel free to post and...
29 September 2008 | 3381 Visits | Rating: No votes
good news but could be better!
When I read the title I thought the Office adopted the Peer-to-patent approach towards open evaluation of patent applications. But then it's only about a website.
Would be nice to fit a peer-to-patent experimentation in this wider policy, so that openness becomes not only a technological choice but a wider approach.
See www.peertopatent.org
ePractice.eu provides its members with a blog in which all registered users can post opinions, questions and links to news related to eGovernment, eInclusion and eHealth. Your point of view is what makes ePractice.eu relevant to other public administrators all over Europe, so feel free to post and...
29 September 2008 | 3382 Visits | Rating: No votes
good news but could be better!
When I read the title I thought the Office adopted the Peer-to-patent approach towards open evaluation of patent applications. But then it's only about a website.
Would be nice to fit a peer-to-patent experimentation in this wider policy, so that openness becomes not only a technological choice but a wider approach.
See www.peertopatent.org
ePractice.eu provides its members with a blog in which all registered users can post opinions, questions and links to news related to eGovernment, eInclusion and eHealth. Your point of view is what makes ePractice.eu relevant to other public administrators all over Europe, so feel free to post and...
29 September 2008 | 3383 Visits | Rating: No votes
good news but could be better!
When I read the title I thought the Office adopted the Peer-to-patent approach towards open evaluation of patent applications. But then it's only about a website.
Would be nice to fit a peer-to-patent experimentation in this wider policy, so that openness becomes not only a technological choice but a wider approach.
See www.peertopatent.org
ePractice.eu provides its members with a blog in which all registered users can post opinions, questions and links to news related to eGovernment, eInclusion and eHealth. Your point of view is what makes ePractice.eu relevant to other public administrators all over Europe, so feel free to post and...
29 September 2008 | 3384 Visits | Rating: No votes
good news but could be better!
When I read the title I thought the Office adopted the Peer-to-patent approach towards open evaluation of patent applications. But then it's only about a website.
Would be nice to fit a peer-to-patent experimentation in this wider policy, so that openness becomes not only a technological choice but a wider approach.
See www.peertopatent.org
ePractice.eu provides its members with a blog in which all registered users can post opinions, questions and links to news related to eGovernment, eInclusion and eHealth. Your point of view is what makes ePractice.eu relevant to other public administrators all over Europe, so feel free to post and...
29 September 2008 | 3385 Visits | Rating: No votes
good news but could be better!
When I read the title I thought the Office adopted the Peer-to-patent approach towards open evaluation of patent applications. But then it's only about a website.
Would be nice to fit a peer-to-patent experimentation in this wider policy, so that openness becomes not only a technological choice but a wider approach.
See www.peertopatent.org
ePractice.eu provides its members with a blog in which all registered users can post opinions, questions and links to news related to eGovernment, eInclusion and eHealth. Your point of view is what makes ePractice.eu relevant to other public administrators all over Europe, so feel free to post and...
29 September 2008 | 3386 Visits | Rating: No votes
good news but could be better!
When I read the title I thought the Office adopted the Peer-to-patent approach towards open evaluation of patent applications. But then it's only about a website.
Would be nice to fit a peer-to-patent experimentation in this wider policy, so that openness becomes not only a technological choice but a wider approach.
See www.peertopatent.org
ePractice.eu provides its members with a blog in which all registered users can post opinions, questions and links to news related to eGovernment, eInclusion and eHealth. Your point of view is what makes ePractice.eu relevant to other public administrators all over Europe, so feel free to post and...
29 September 2008 | 3387 Visits | Rating: No votes
good news but could be better!
When I read the title I thought the Office adopted the Peer-to-patent approach towards open evaluation of patent applications. But then it's only about a website.
Would be nice to fit a peer-to-patent experimentation in this wider policy, so that openness becomes not only a technological choice but a wider approach.
See www.peertopatent.org
ePractice.eu provides its members with a blog in which all registered users can post opinions, questions and links to news related to eGovernment, eInclusion and eHealth. Your point of view is what makes ePractice.eu relevant to other public administrators all over Europe, so feel free to post and...
29 September 2008 | 3388 Visits | Rating: No votes
good news but could be better!
When I read the title I thought the Office adopted the Peer-to-patent approach towards open evaluation of patent applications. But then it's only about a website.
Would be nice to fit a peer-to-patent experimentation in this wider policy, so that openness becomes not only a technological choice but a wider approach.
See www.peertopatent.org
ePractice.eu provides its members with a blog in which all registered users can post opinions, questions and links to news related to eGovernment, eInclusion and eHealth. Your point of view is what makes ePractice.eu relevant to other public administrators all over Europe, so feel free to post and...
29 September 2008 | 3389 Visits | Rating: No votes
good news but could be better!
When I read the title I thought the Office adopted the Peer-to-patent approach towards open evaluation of patent applications. But then it's only about a website.
Would be nice to fit a peer-to-patent experimentation in this wider policy, so that openness becomes not only a technological choice but a wider approach.
See www.peertopatent.org
ePractice.eu provides its members with a blog in which all registered users can post opinions, questions and links to news related to eGovernment, eInclusion and eHealth. Your point of view is what makes ePractice.eu relevant to other public administrators all over Europe, so feel free to post and...
29 September 2008 | 3390 Visits | Rating: No votes
good news but could be better!
When I read the title I thought the Office adopted the Peer-to-patent approach towards open evaluation of patent applications. But then it's only about a website.
Would be nice to fit a peer-to-patent experimentation in this wider policy, so that openness becomes not only a technological choice but a wider approach.
See www.peertopatent.org
The ePractice blog: discuss, praise, disagree.
ePractice.eu provides its members with a blog in which all registered users can post opinions, questions and links to news related to eGovernment, eInclusion and eHealth. Your point of view is what makes ePractice.eu relevant to other public administrators all over Europe, so feel free to post and...
good news but could be better!
When I read the title I thought the Office adopted the Peer-to-patent approach towards open evaluation of patent applications. But then it's only about a website.
Would be nice to fit a peer-to-patent experimentation in this wider policy, so that openness becomes not only a technological choice but a wider approach.
See www.peertopatent.org
The ePractice blog: discuss, praise, disagree.
ePractice.eu provides its members with a blog in which all registered users can post opinions, questions and links to news related to eGovernment, eInclusion and eHealth. Your point of view is what makes ePractice.eu relevant to other public administrators all over Europe, so feel free to post and...
good news but could be better!
When I read the title I thought the Office adopted the Peer-to-patent approach towards open evaluation of patent applications. But then it's only about a website.
Would be nice to fit a peer-to-patent experimentation in this wider policy, so that openness becomes not only a technological choice but a wider approach.
See www.peertopatent.org
The ePractice blog: discuss, praise, disagree.
ePractice.eu provides its members with a blog in which all registered users can post opinions, questions and links to news related to eGovernment, eInclusion and eHealth. Your point of view is what makes ePractice.eu relevant to other public administrators all over Europe, so feel free to post and...
good news but could be better!
When I read the title I thought the Office adopted the Peer-to-patent approach towards open evaluation of patent applications. But then it's only about a website.
Would be nice to fit a peer-to-patent experimentation in this wider policy, so that openness becomes not only a technological choice but a wider approach.
See www.peertopatent.org
The ePractice blog: discuss, praise, disagree.
ePractice.eu provides its members with a blog in which all registered users can post opinions, questions and links to news related to eGovernment, eInclusion and eHealth. Your point of view is what makes ePractice.eu relevant to other public administrators all over Europe, so feel free to post and...
good news but could be better!
When I read the title I thought the Office adopted the Peer-to-patent approach towards open evaluation of patent applications. But then it's only about a website.
Would be nice to fit a peer-to-patent experimentation in this wider policy, so that openness becomes not only a technological choice but a wider approach.
See www.peertopatent.org
The ePractice blog: discuss, praise, disagree.
ePractice.eu provides its members with a blog in which all registered users can post opinions, questions and links to news related to eGovernment, eInclusion and eHealth. Your point of view is what makes ePractice.eu relevant to other public administrators all over Europe, so feel free to post and...
good news but could be better!
When I read the title I thought the Office adopted the Peer-to-patent approach towards open evaluation of patent applications. But then it's only about a website.
Would be nice to fit a peer-to-patent experimentation in this wider policy, so that openness becomes not only a technological choice but a wider approach.
See www.peertopatent.org
The ePractice blog: discuss, praise, disagree.
ePractice.eu provides its members with a blog in which all registered users can post opinions, questions and links to news related to eGovernment, eInclusion and eHealth. Your point of view is what makes ePractice.eu relevant to other public administrators all over Europe, so feel free to post and...
good news but could be better!
When I read the title I thought the Office adopted the Peer-to-patent approach towards open evaluation of patent applications. But then it's only about a website.
Would be nice to fit a peer-to-patent experimentation in this wider policy, so that openness becomes not only a technological choice but a wider approach.
See www.peertopatent.org
The ePractice blog: discuss, praise, disagree.
ePractice.eu provides its members with a blog in which all registered users can post opinions, questions and links to news related to eGovernment, eInclusion and eHealth. Your point of view is what makes ePractice.eu relevant to other public administrators all over Europe, so feel free to post and...
good news but could be better!
When I read the title I thought the Office adopted the Peer-to-patent approach towards open evaluation of patent applications. But then it's only about a website.
Would be nice to fit a peer-to-patent experimentation in this wider policy, so that openness becomes not only a technological choice but a wider approach.
See www.peertopatent.org
The ePractice blog: discuss, praise, disagree.
ePractice.eu provides its members with a blog in which all registered users can post opinions, questions and links to news related to eGovernment, eInclusion and eHealth. Your point of view is what makes ePractice.eu relevant to other public administrators all over Europe, so feel free to post and...
good news but could be better!
When I read the title I thought the Office adopted the Peer-to-patent approach towards open evaluation of patent applications. But then it's only about a website.
Would be nice to fit a peer-to-patent experimentation in this wider policy, so that openness becomes not only a technological choice but a wider approach.
See www.peertopatent.org
The ePractice blog: discuss, praise, disagree.
ePractice.eu provides its members with a blog in which all registered users can post opinions, questions and links to news related to eGovernment, eInclusion and eHealth. Your point of view is what makes ePractice.eu relevant to other public administrators all over Europe, so feel free to post and...
good news but could be better!
When I read the title I thought the Office adopted the Peer-to-patent approach towards open evaluation of patent applications. But then it's only about a website.
Would be nice to fit a peer-to-patent experimentation in this wider policy, so that openness becomes not only a technological choice but a wider approach.
See www.peertopatent.org
The ePractice blog: discuss, praise, disagree.
ePractice.eu provides its members with a blog in which all registered users can post opinions, questions and links to news related to eGovernment, eInclusion and eHealth. Your point of view is what makes ePractice.eu relevant to other public administrators all over Europe, so feel free to post and...
good news but could be better!
When I read the title I thought the Office adopted the Peer-to-patent approach towards open evaluation of patent applications. But then it's only about a website.
Would be nice to fit a peer-to-patent experimentation in this wider policy, so that openness becomes not only a technological choice but a wider approach.
See www.peertopatent.org