practice
The ePractice blog: discuss, praise, disagree.
ePractice.eu provides its members with a blog in which all registered users can post opinions, questions and links to news related to eGovernment, eInclusion and eHealth. Your point of view is what makes ePractice.eu relevant to other public administrators all over Europe, so feel free to post and...
01 September 2008 | 3160 Visits | Rating: No votes
A clear and sound proposal for measuring eGov 2.0
As an old-fashioned eGovernment 1.0 official, I can only thank you for this clear and sound proposal.
The approach is brilliant but so simple that I can only hope it will be taken into account for future benchmarkings.
I cannot grasp yet how to apply it to my daily work, but I will definitively reflect on it, at least for the coming epractice.eu improvements.
03 September 2008
Article 3
I too agree. Interesting to note the direct outspoken comments in the first paragraph. It is possible for transparency to remove scheming tactics. Perhaps some aspects of Article 5 could be incorporated.
05 September 2008
Thanks for the positive feedback
Emilio, thanks a lot for the feedback also on the blog, hope we can discuss it some time soon.
Stella, what articles do you refer to?
29 January 2009
Dear friends
Yes indeed. But in this case it would be fairly reasonable to look out of the box and introduce also multilingual new measurement and benchmarks based on SE-data. We are using these sources at the IFAAR for quite a time. Sometimes even testing before new portals are built. Multilingual measurement takes in account local differences and the SE-data from meny different search engine log's help to get a citizen-centric vision of what really makes sense in terms of e-gov. Why should government want to do e-gov when no one is really interested? I think government can spend money much more reasonable than on web-portals which don't work or have no active demand among the citizens. If it can't be measured it is not managable. The indicators used until now don't change this situation.
The ePractice blog: discuss, praise, disagree.
ePractice.eu provides its members with a blog in which all registered users can post opinions, questions and links to news related to eGovernment, eInclusion and eHealth. Your point of view is what makes ePractice.eu relevant to other public administrators all over Europe, so feel free to post and...
01 September 2008 | 3161 Visits | Rating: No votes
A clear and sound proposal for measuring eGov 2.0
As an old-fashioned eGovernment 1.0 official, I can only thank you for this clear and sound proposal.
The approach is brilliant but so simple that I can only hope it will be taken into account for future benchmarkings.
I cannot grasp yet how to apply it to my daily work, but I will definitively reflect on it, at least for the coming epractice.eu improvements.
03 September 2008
Article 3
I too agree. Interesting to note the direct outspoken comments in the first paragraph. It is possible for transparency to remove scheming tactics. Perhaps some aspects of Article 5 could be incorporated.
05 September 2008
Thanks for the positive feedback
Emilio, thanks a lot for the feedback also on the blog, hope we can discuss it some time soon.
Stella, what articles do you refer to?
29 January 2009
Dear friends
Yes indeed. But in this case it would be fairly reasonable to look out of the box and introduce also multilingual new measurement and benchmarks based on SE-data. We are using these sources at the IFAAR for quite a time. Sometimes even testing before new portals are built. Multilingual measurement takes in account local differences and the SE-data from meny different search engine log's help to get a citizen-centric vision of what really makes sense in terms of e-gov. Why should government want to do e-gov when no one is really interested? I think government can spend money much more reasonable than on web-portals which don't work or have no active demand among the citizens. If it can't be measured it is not managable. The indicators used until now don't change this situation.
The ePractice blog: discuss, praise, disagree.
ePractice.eu provides its members with a blog in which all registered users can post opinions, questions and links to news related to eGovernment, eInclusion and eHealth. Your point of view is what makes ePractice.eu relevant to other public administrators all over Europe, so feel free to post and...
01 September 2008 | 3162 Visits | Rating: No votes
A clear and sound proposal for measuring eGov 2.0
As an old-fashioned eGovernment 1.0 official, I can only thank you for this clear and sound proposal.
The approach is brilliant but so simple that I can only hope it will be taken into account for future benchmarkings.
I cannot grasp yet how to apply it to my daily work, but I will definitively reflect on it, at least for the coming epractice.eu improvements.
03 September 2008
Article 3
I too agree. Interesting to note the direct outspoken comments in the first paragraph. It is possible for transparency to remove scheming tactics. Perhaps some aspects of Article 5 could be incorporated.
05 September 2008
Thanks for the positive feedback
Emilio, thanks a lot for the feedback also on the blog, hope we can discuss it some time soon.
Stella, what articles do you refer to?
29 January 2009
Dear friends
Yes indeed. But in this case it would be fairly reasonable to look out of the box and introduce also multilingual new measurement and benchmarks based on SE-data. We are using these sources at the IFAAR for quite a time. Sometimes even testing before new portals are built. Multilingual measurement takes in account local differences and the SE-data from meny different search engine log's help to get a citizen-centric vision of what really makes sense in terms of e-gov. Why should government want to do e-gov when no one is really interested? I think government can spend money much more reasonable than on web-portals which don't work or have no active demand among the citizens. If it can't be measured it is not managable. The indicators used until now don't change this situation.
The ePractice blog: discuss, praise, disagree.
ePractice.eu provides its members with a blog in which all registered users can post opinions, questions and links to news related to eGovernment, eInclusion and eHealth. Your point of view is what makes ePractice.eu relevant to other public administrators all over Europe, so feel free to post and...
01 September 2008 | 3163 Visits | Rating: No votes
A clear and sound proposal for measuring eGov 2.0
As an old-fashioned eGovernment 1.0 official, I can only thank you for this clear and sound proposal.
The approach is brilliant but so simple that I can only hope it will be taken into account for future benchmarkings.
I cannot grasp yet how to apply it to my daily work, but I will definitively reflect on it, at least for the coming epractice.eu improvements.
03 September 2008
Article 3
I too agree. Interesting to note the direct outspoken comments in the first paragraph. It is possible for transparency to remove scheming tactics. Perhaps some aspects of Article 5 could be incorporated.
05 September 2008
Thanks for the positive feedback
Emilio, thanks a lot for the feedback also on the blog, hope we can discuss it some time soon.
Stella, what articles do you refer to?
29 January 2009
Dear friends
Yes indeed. But in this case it would be fairly reasonable to look out of the box and introduce also multilingual new measurement and benchmarks based on SE-data. We are using these sources at the IFAAR for quite a time. Sometimes even testing before new portals are built. Multilingual measurement takes in account local differences and the SE-data from meny different search engine log's help to get a citizen-centric vision of what really makes sense in terms of e-gov. Why should government want to do e-gov when no one is really interested? I think government can spend money much more reasonable than on web-portals which don't work or have no active demand among the citizens. If it can't be measured it is not managable. The indicators used until now don't change this situation.
The ePractice blog: discuss, praise, disagree.
ePractice.eu provides its members with a blog in which all registered users can post opinions, questions and links to news related to eGovernment, eInclusion and eHealth. Your point of view is what makes ePractice.eu relevant to other public administrators all over Europe, so feel free to post and...
01 September 2008 | 3164 Visits | Rating: No votes
A clear and sound proposal for measuring eGov 2.0
As an old-fashioned eGovernment 1.0 official, I can only thank you for this clear and sound proposal.
The approach is brilliant but so simple that I can only hope it will be taken into account for future benchmarkings.
I cannot grasp yet how to apply it to my daily work, but I will definitively reflect on it, at least for the coming epractice.eu improvements.
03 September 2008
Article 3
I too agree. Interesting to note the direct outspoken comments in the first paragraph. It is possible for transparency to remove scheming tactics. Perhaps some aspects of Article 5 could be incorporated.
05 September 2008
Thanks for the positive feedback
Emilio, thanks a lot for the feedback also on the blog, hope we can discuss it some time soon.
Stella, what articles do you refer to?
29 January 2009
Dear friends
Yes indeed. But in this case it would be fairly reasonable to look out of the box and introduce also multilingual new measurement and benchmarks based on SE-data. We are using these sources at the IFAAR for quite a time. Sometimes even testing before new portals are built. Multilingual measurement takes in account local differences and the SE-data from meny different search engine log's help to get a citizen-centric vision of what really makes sense in terms of e-gov. Why should government want to do e-gov when no one is really interested? I think government can spend money much more reasonable than on web-portals which don't work or have no active demand among the citizens. If it can't be measured it is not managable. The indicators used until now don't change this situation.
The ePractice blog: discuss, praise, disagree.
ePractice.eu provides its members with a blog in which all registered users can post opinions, questions and links to news related to eGovernment, eInclusion and eHealth. Your point of view is what makes ePractice.eu relevant to other public administrators all over Europe, so feel free to post and...
A clear and sound proposal for measuring eGov 2.0
As an old-fashioned eGovernment 1.0 official, I can only thank you for this clear and sound proposal.
The approach is brilliant but so simple that I can only hope it will be taken into account for future benchmarkings.
I cannot grasp yet how to apply it to my daily work, but I will definitively reflect on it, at least for the coming epractice.eu improvements.
Article 3
I too agree. Interesting to note the direct outspoken comments in the first paragraph. It is possible for transparency to remove scheming tactics. Perhaps some aspects of Article 5 could be incorporated.
Thanks for the positive feedback
Emilio, thanks a lot for the feedback also on the blog, hope we can discuss it some time soon.
Stella, what articles do you refer to?
Dear friends
Yes indeed. But in this case it would be fairly reasonable to look out of the box and introduce also multilingual new measurement and benchmarks based on SE-data. We are using these sources at the IFAAR for quite a time. Sometimes even testing before new portals are built. Multilingual measurement takes in account local differences and the SE-data from meny different search engine log's help to get a citizen-centric vision of what really makes sense in terms of e-gov. Why should government want to do e-gov when no one is really interested? I think government can spend money much more reasonable than on web-portals which don't work or have no active demand among the citizens. If it can't be measured it is not managable. The indicators used until now don't change this situation.
The ePractice blog: discuss, praise, disagree.
ePractice.eu provides its members with a blog in which all registered users can post opinions, questions and links to news related to eGovernment, eInclusion and eHealth. Your point of view is what makes ePractice.eu relevant to other public administrators all over Europe, so feel free to post and...
A clear and sound proposal for measuring eGov 2.0
As an old-fashioned eGovernment 1.0 official, I can only thank you for this clear and sound proposal.
The approach is brilliant but so simple that I can only hope it will be taken into account for future benchmarkings.
I cannot grasp yet how to apply it to my daily work, but I will definitively reflect on it, at least for the coming epractice.eu improvements.
Article 3
I too agree. Interesting to note the direct outspoken comments in the first paragraph. It is possible for transparency to remove scheming tactics. Perhaps some aspects of Article 5 could be incorporated.
Thanks for the positive feedback
Emilio, thanks a lot for the feedback also on the blog, hope we can discuss it some time soon.
Stella, what articles do you refer to?
Dear friends
Yes indeed. But in this case it would be fairly reasonable to look out of the box and introduce also multilingual new measurement and benchmarks based on SE-data. We are using these sources at the IFAAR for quite a time. Sometimes even testing before new portals are built. Multilingual measurement takes in account local differences and the SE-data from meny different search engine log's help to get a citizen-centric vision of what really makes sense in terms of e-gov. Why should government want to do e-gov when no one is really interested? I think government can spend money much more reasonable than on web-portals which don't work or have no active demand among the citizens. If it can't be measured it is not managable. The indicators used until now don't change this situation.