ePractice.eu provides its members with a blog in which all registered users can post opinions, questions and links to news related to eGovernment, eInclusion and eHealth. Your point of view is what makes ePractice.eu relevant to other public administrators all over Europe, so feel free to post and...
Your writing is really clear and I do agree with your main conclusion.Even if I have less facilities to express an opinion in english , I would like to submit some commentary regarding the question of new global design of digital systems.
It's easy to admire the results of that technological sphere in which we daily manage our work and our professional relations.Very often we feel more secure to reach people or colleagues in the world, to access high quality knowledge delivered by other entities or other people that we try to know better: shortly speaking , we could say that we can invest our competencies in more things with less lost of time.However, the new design of that global knowledge could certainly beneficiate of innovation so that the coming new systems could deliver knowledge taking care of the real reality of a community ...in which we find subjectivity and objectivity.
Communication and professional talks on classical level of relationship progress on a linear way , consuming time and ... silence.. between phases of exchange and sometimes "reflexion" + synthesis.Digital world delivers packs of knowledge letting reader use his skills and subjectivity, and the risk of error can't be minimized.A new design should deliver knowledge and content by offering a range of internal risk evaluation , so that the reader can decide where he will try to improve the pack of knowledge on which he works.In one word, intelligent systems could be in capacity to prove that the reader will be more intelligent after using the evaluation proposed by the internal evaluation...???
In conclusion, we know and appreciate that the volume of digital knowledge can be quickly joined; but we certainly will be secured to read how the system delivers an OWN autoanalysis!! then we can let our personal subjectivity conduct the last investigations .kANT wrote much about RAISON PURE and ethics , freedom and constraint in civil life; consequences of those paradigms and concepts could be recycled in digital world... Such relooked systems could facilitate the life of citizen in charge of RIGHTS and OBLIGATIONS.
MPH




In order to vote, you need to be logged in!