Acronym of the case:
VASolution
Web address of the case:
Country of the case:
Norway
City/region:
Oslo
Posting Date:
13 May 2008
Last Edited Date:
13 October 2009
Author:
Leif Buene (Det Norske Veritas AS)
Type of initiative
Project or service
Acronym of the case:
Web address of the case:
Country of the case:
City/region:
Posting Date:
Last Edited Date:
Author:
Project or service
Business Model Question
I guess this service is designed in such a way that the receiver (relying party) is the entity that pays for validation?
Although this may sound like a good idea it only works for limited number of closed PKIs like the Swedish BankID. Most EU PKIs are as far as I know open, allowing anybody to validate a signature.
Business Model Question
No, on the contrary - this is a solution that works even better for open PKIs. The idea is to relieve the Relying Party of the burden to validate e-signatures and eIDs on their own by providing this as a service to them. The solution will allow them to validate signatures based on eIDs from many different eID issuers with only one integration and agreement - namely with the VA.Â
Furthermore, the solution will provide information about the quality of the eIDs and e-signatures (not only the validity) based on an independent classification according to a quality classification scheme. Thus, it can provide a fitness-for-purpose assessment of the signatures/eIDs.